UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
VS
Quadro 4000M

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Quadro 4000M

Intel

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

2011Core: 475 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000M

#49
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
95%
#50
93%
#51
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015
92%
#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
90%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
89%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
87%
#76
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
918%
#91
Quadro 4000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#93
Radeon Pro 580
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
96%
#94
T1000 8GB
MSRP: $500|Avg: $380
95%
#99
Quadro K620
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
92%
#100
Tesla K20Xm
MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A
91%
#105
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 4000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 4000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)Quadro 4000M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity
Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and Quadro 4000M

Intel

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,300 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) scores 1,300 and the Quadro 4000M reaches 1,287 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro 4000M uses Fermi, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)) vs 336 (Quadro 4000M).

FeatureUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)Quadro 4000M
G3D Mark Score
1,300+1%
1,287
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Fermi
Process Node
10 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
32
336+950%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)Quadro 4000M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000M has 2 GB. The Quadro 4000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)Quadro 4000M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) draws 15W versus the Quadro 4000M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)) vs 350W (Quadro 4000M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)Quadro 4000M
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
86.7+572%
12.9
💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)Quadro 4000M
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
Codename
Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
GF104
Release
May 28 2019
February 22 2011
Ranking
#820
#801