UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs GeForce 940M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

4

1,100

0.0%

1,133

+3.0%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 4060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 940M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 940M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU).

Insight	UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)	GeForce 940M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity	Gen. 11 (2021) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 940M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) Benchmark Check

GeForce 940M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) and GeForce 940M

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Gen. 11 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 4W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.

GeForce 940M

The GeForce 940M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,133 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) scores 1,100 and the GeForce 940M reaches 1,133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is built on Gen. 11 while the GeForce 940M uses Maxwell, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 24 (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) vs 384 (GeForce 940M). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 1176 MHz.

Feature	UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)	GeForce 940M
G3D Mark Score	1,100	1,133+3%
Architecture	Gen. 11	Maxwell
Process Node	10 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	24	384+1500%
Boost Clock	800 MHz	1176 MHz+47%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)	GeForce 940M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 940M has 2 GB. The GeForce 940M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)	GeForce 940M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 940M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)	GeForce 940M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 940M). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce 940M).

Feature	UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)	GeForce 940M
Encoder	QuickSync	NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder	QuickSync	PureVideo HD (VP6)
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) draws 4W versus the GeForce 940M's 33W — a 156.8% difference. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) vs 350W (GeForce 940M). Power connectors: Integrated vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.