
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs HD Graphics 630

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Popular choices:

HD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The HD Graphics 630 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The HD Graphics 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU).
| Insight | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) | HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 (2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the HD Graphics 630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) and HD Graphics 630

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Gen. 11 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 4W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.

HD Graphics 630
The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) scores 1,100 and the HD Graphics 630 reaches 1,111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is built on Gen. 11 while the HD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 24 (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) vs 192 (HD Graphics 630). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) | HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,100 | 1,111+1% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 24 | 192+700% |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | 1000 MHz+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) | HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) | HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) draws 4W versus the HD Graphics 630's 15W — a 115.8% difference. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) vs 1W (HD Graphics 630). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) | HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 4W-73% | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 275.0+271% | 74.1 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the HD Graphics 630 launched at $100 and now averages $30. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) vs 37.0 (HD Graphics 630) — the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) | HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 37.0 |
| Codename | Gen. 11 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Release | January 11 2021 | January 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #918 | #823 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















