
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs FirePro V7900

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:

FirePro V7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2011). The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V7900 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V7900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake).
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro V7900 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) and FirePro V7900

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.

FirePro V7900
The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) scores 2,200 and the FirePro V7900 reaches 2,261 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is built on Gen. 12 while the FirePro V7900 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7900).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,200 | 2,261+3% |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 32 | 1280+3900% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7900 has 2 GB. The FirePro V7900 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs 11.2 (FirePro V7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Xe) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs None (FirePro V7900). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Xe) vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro V7900).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video (Xe) | None |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video (Xe) | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) draws 15W versus the FirePro V7900's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs 350W (FirePro V7900). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 100°C.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 279mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-25% | 100°C |
| Perf/Watt | 146.7+872% | 15.1 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro V7900 launched at $999 and now averages $120. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) costs 100+% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs 18.8 (FirePro V7900) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2011).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | FirePro V7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 18.8 |
| Codename | Rocket Lake Xe | Cayman |
| Release | March 30 2021 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #809 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















