UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs Quadro M600M
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:
Quadro M600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M600M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M600M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake).
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) and Quadro M600M
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Quadro M600M
The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) scores 2,200 and the Quadro M600M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is built on Gen. 12 while the Quadro M600M uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs 384 (Quadro M600M). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,200 | 2,221 |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 32 | 384+1100% |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz+66% | 876 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M600M has 2 GB. The Quadro M600M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Xe) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro M600M). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Xe) vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M600M).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video (Xe) | NVENC 4th Gen |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video (Xe) | PureVideo HD (VP5) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) draws 15W versus the Quadro M600M's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) vs 350W (Quadro M600M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 146.7+98% | 74.0 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | Quadro M600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | Rocket Lake Xe | GM107 |
| Release | March 30 2021 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #809 | #658 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) and Quadro M600M
