V-Series V105
VS
Celeron 1037U

V-Series V105 vs Celeron 1037U

AMD

V-Series V105

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron 1037U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The V-Series V105 is positioned at rank 865 and the Celeron 1037U is on rank 275, so the Celeron 1037U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar V-Series V105

#853
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1427%
#854
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1406%
#855
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1291%
#856
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1285%
#857
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1273%
#859
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1230%
#860
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1179%
#861
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1177%
#862
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1145%
#865
V-Series V105
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
98%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
#880
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1037U

#263
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
426%
#264
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
419%
#265
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
385%
#266
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
383%
#267
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
380%
#269
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
367%
#270
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
352%
#271
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
351%
#272
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
342%
#275
Celeron 1037U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 1037U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the V-Series V105 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightV-Series V105Celeron 1037U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightV-Series V105Celeron 1037U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of V-Series V105 and Celeron 1037U

AMD

V-Series V105

The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 1037U

The Celeron 1037U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,034 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

The V-Series V105 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron 1037U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 1037U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1037U — a 40% clock advantage for the Celeron 1037U. The Celeron 1037U is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the V-Series V105 scores 1,028 against the Celeron 1037U's 1,034 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 1037U.

FeatureV-Series V105Celeron 1037U
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
1.8 GHz+50%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,028
1,034
Geekbench 6 Single
324
Geekbench 6 Multi
626
🧠

Memory & Platform

The V-Series V105 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 1037U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureV-Series V105Celeron 1037U
Socket
S1
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (V-Series V105) / VT-x, EPT (Celeron 1037U). The Celeron 1037U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the V-Series V105 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1037U targets Budget Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 1037U rivals AMD E1-2500.

FeatureV-Series V105Celeron 1037U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget Mobile