V-Series V105
VS
Pentium E6300

V-Series V105 vs Pentium E6300

AMD

V-Series V105

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium E6300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The V-Series V105 is positioned at rank 865 and the Pentium E6300 is on rank 958, so the V-Series V105 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar V-Series V105

#853
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1427%
#854
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1406%
#855
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1291%
#856
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1285%
#857
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1273%
#859
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1230%
#860
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1179%
#861
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1177%
#862
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1145%
#865
V-Series V105
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
98%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
#880
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
25363%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
23966%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17401%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5242%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4152%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3633%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2081%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2053%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1870%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1869%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1849%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1799%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1774%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1766%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1750%
#958
Pentium E6300
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
100%
#959
Core i5-661
MSRP: $196|Avg: $40
99%
#960
Core i3-4150
MSRP: $281|Avg: $70
99%
#961
Core i5-750
MSRP: $210|Avg: $30
99%
#962
Core i3-2100T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $127
98%
#963
Pentium E2210
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
97%
#964
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
97%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
96%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
96%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
96%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
95%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
95%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
95%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
94%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium E6300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the V-Series V105 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightV-Series V105Pentium E6300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightV-Series V105Pentium E6300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of V-Series V105 and Pentium E6300

AMD

V-Series V105

The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium E6300

The Pentium E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $40.

Processing Power

The V-Series V105 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium E6300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium E6300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E6300 — a 80% clock advantage for the Pentium E6300. The Pentium E6300 is built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. In PassMark, the V-Series V105 scores 1,028 against the Pentium E6300's 1,032 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium E6300.

FeatureV-Series V105Pentium E6300
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+133%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
2 MB (total)+300%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,028
1,032
🧠

Memory & Platform

The V-Series V105 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureV-Series V105Pentium E6300
Socket
S1
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1