V-Series V105
VS
Celeron 2981U

V-Series V105 vs Celeron 2981U

AMD

V-Series V105

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron 2981U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The V-Series V105 is positioned at rank 865 and the Celeron 2981U is on rank 426, so the Celeron 2981U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar V-Series V105

#853
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1427%
#854
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1406%
#855
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1291%
#856
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1285%
#857
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1273%
#859
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1230%
#860
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1179%
#861
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1177%
#862
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1145%
#865
V-Series V105
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
98%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
#880
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2981U

#414
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
566%
#415
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
558%
#416
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
512%
#417
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
510%
#418
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
505%
#420
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
488%
#421
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
468%
#422
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
467%
#423
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
455%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 2981U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the V-Series V105 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightV-Series V105Celeron 2981U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($137)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightV-Series V105Celeron 2981U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($137)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of V-Series V105 and Celeron 2981U

AMD

V-Series V105

The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 2981U

The Celeron 2981U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,036 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The V-Series V105 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron 2981U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 2981U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 2981U — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 2981U. The Celeron 2981U is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the V-Series V105 scores 1,028 against the Celeron 2981U's 1,036 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron 2981U.

FeatureV-Series V105Celeron 2981U
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
1.6 GHz+33%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,028
1,036
🧠

Memory & Platform

The V-Series V105 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2981U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureV-Series V105Celeron 2981U
Socket
S1
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (V-Series V105) / VT-x (Celeron 2981U). The Celeron 2981U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the V-Series V105 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2981U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2981U rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureV-Series V105Celeron 2981U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget