
VIA Nano X2 U4025 vs Celeron P4505

VIA Nano X2 U4025

Celeron P4505
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The VIA Nano X2 U4025 is positioned at rank 831 and the Celeron P4505 is on rank 1059, so the VIA Nano X2 U4025 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano X2 U4025
Performance Per Dollar Celeron P4505
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | VIA Nano X2 U4025 | Celeron P4505 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($86) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (CNC (2011) / 40 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | VIA Nano X2 U4025 | Celeron P4505 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($86) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of VIA Nano X2 U4025 and Celeron P4505
VIA Nano X2 U4025
The VIA Nano X2 U4025 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in Janeiro 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNC (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 885 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron P4505
The Celeron P4505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 918 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the VIA Nano X2 U4025 and Celeron P4505 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the VIA Nano X2 U4025 versus 0.07 GHz on the Celeron P4505 — a 178% clock advantage for the VIA Nano X2 U4025. The VIA Nano X2 U4025 uses the CNC (2011) architecture (40 nm), while the Celeron P4505 uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the VIA Nano X2 U4025 scores 885 against the Celeron P4505's 918 — a 3.7% lead for the Celeron P4505.
| Feature | VIA Nano X2 U4025 | Celeron P4505 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz+1614% | 0.07 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.86 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 40 nm | 32 nm-20% |
| Architecture | CNC (2011) | Westmere (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 885 | 918+4% |
Memory & Platform
The VIA Nano X2 U4025 uses the NanoBGA2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron P4505 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | VIA Nano X2 U4025 | Celeron P4505 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | NanoBGA2 | BGA1288 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (VIA Nano X2 U4025) / true (Celeron P4505). The Celeron P4505 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the VIA Nano X2 U4025 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron P4505 rivals Pentium P6000.
| Feature | VIA Nano X2 U4025 | Celeron P4505 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















