VIA Nano X2 U4025
VS
Pentium D 950

VIA Nano X2 U4025 vs Pentium D 950

VIA Nano X2 U4025

2 Cores2 Thrd13 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium D 950

2 Cores2 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The VIA Nano X2 U4025 is positioned at rank 831 and the Pentium D 950 is on rank 1110, so the VIA Nano X2 U4025 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano X2 U4025

#818
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1326%
#819
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1306%
#820
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1199%
#821
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1194%
#822
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1183%
#824
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1142%
#825
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1095%
#826
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1094%
#827
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1064%
#831
VIA Nano X2 U4025
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#834
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#835
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium D 950

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
212051%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
200367%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
145483%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
43828%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
34716%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
30370%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
17395%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
17167%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
15631%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
15630%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
15455%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
15038%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
14828%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
14768%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
14634%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
100%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
99%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
95%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
86%
#1114
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
85%
#1115
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
85%
#1116
Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: $440|Avg: $20
84%
#1117
Pentium 4 2.26
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
83%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
82%
#1119
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
80%
#1120
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
80%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
79%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
76%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
75%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
70%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium D 950 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the VIA Nano X2 U4025 in both compute-intensive tasks (5.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightVIA Nano X2 U4025Pentium D 950
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (CNC (2011) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightVIA Nano X2 U4025Pentium D 950
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of VIA Nano X2 U4025 and Pentium D 950

VIA Nano X2 U4025

The VIA Nano X2 U4025 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in Janeiro 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNC (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 885 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium D 950

The Pentium D 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 January 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $637.

Processing Power

Both the VIA Nano X2 U4025 and Pentium D 950 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the VIA Nano X2 U4025 versus 3.4 GHz on the Pentium D 950 — a 95.7% clock advantage for the Pentium D 950. The VIA Nano X2 U4025 uses the CNC (2011) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium D 950 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the VIA Nano X2 U4025 scores 885 against the Pentium D 950's 935 — a 5.5% lead for the Pentium D 950.

FeatureVIA Nano X2 U4025Pentium D 950
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
3.4 GHz+183%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (total)+100%
Process
40 nm-38%
65 nm
Architecture
CNC (2011)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
885
935+6%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The VIA Nano X2 U4025 uses the NanoBGA2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium D 950 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureVIA Nano X2 U4025Pentium D 950
Socket
NanoBGA2
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1