VIA Nano X2 U4025
VS
Pentium Dual-Core E2160

VIA Nano X2 U4025 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160

VIA Nano X2 U4025

2 Cores2 Thrd13 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual-Core E2160

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The VIA Nano X2 U4025 is positioned at rank 831 and the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is on rank 990, so the VIA Nano X2 U4025 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano X2 U4025

#818
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1326%
#819
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1306%
#820
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1199%
#821
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1194%
#822
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1183%
#824
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1142%
#825
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1095%
#826
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1094%
#827
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1064%
#831
VIA Nano X2 U4025
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#834
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#835
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual-Core E2160

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29915%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
28267%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
20524%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6183%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4898%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4284%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2454%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2422%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2205%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2205%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2180%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2121%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2092%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2083%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2064%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
98%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
100%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
98%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
98%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
98%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
98%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
97%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
96%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
93%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
91%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
90%
#1004
Core i5-655K
MSRP: $216|Avg: $55
90%
#1005
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium Dual-Core E2160 leads in gaming performance. However, the VIA Nano X2 U4025 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightVIA Nano X2 U4025Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (CNC (2011) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightVIA Nano X2 U4025Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of VIA Nano X2 U4025 and Pentium Dual-Core E2160

VIA Nano X2 U4025

The VIA Nano X2 U4025 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in Janeiro 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNC (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 885 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium Dual-Core E2160

The Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 875 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the VIA Nano X2 U4025 and Pentium Dual-Core E2160 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the VIA Nano X2 U4025 versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 — a 40% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual-Core E2160. The VIA Nano X2 U4025 uses the CNC (2011) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the VIA Nano X2 U4025 scores 885 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2160's 875 — a 1.1% lead for the VIA Nano X2 U4025.

FeatureVIA Nano X2 U4025Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
1.8 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (total)
Process
40 nm-38%
65 nm
Architecture
CNC (2011)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
885+1%
875
🧠

Memory & Platform

The VIA Nano X2 U4025 uses the NanoBGA2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureVIA Nano X2 U4025Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Socket
NanoBGA2
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1