Xeon 6325P vs Xeon E7-4809 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6325P vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6325P vs Xeon E7-4809 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6325P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 105W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,346 vs 16,471).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4809 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6325P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌90.9% higher power demand at 105W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Xeon 6325P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6325P better than Xeon E7-4809 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6325P is ahead with a 24.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4809 v2 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4809 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6325P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6325P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E7-4809 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (58.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6325P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2014) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6325P vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6325P

The Xeon 6325P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 16,346 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to none. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 16,471 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6325P packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E7-4809 v2 has 2 more cores. The Xeon 6325P is built on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon 6325P scores 16,346 against the Xeon E7-4809 v2's 16,471 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E7-4809 v2. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6325P vs 12 MB on the Xeon E7-4809 v2.

Feature	Xeon 6325P	Xeon E7-4809 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	none
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+84%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	—
PassMark	16,346	16,471

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6325P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.