
Xeon 6325P

Xeon Gold 6134
Xeon 6325P vs Xeon Gold 6134 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon 6325P vs Xeon Gold 6134 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon 6325P vs Xeon Gold 6134: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon 6325P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,933 less on MSRP ($281 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 679.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.2 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 130W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,346 vs 16,519).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6134
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 58.2 PassMark/$ ($2,214 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ❌136.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon 6325P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6325P better than Xeon Gold 6134?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6325P vs Xeon Gold 6134 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6325P
The Xeon 6325P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 16,346 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon Gold 6134
The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6325P packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6134 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6134 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon 6325P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Xeon 6325P (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon 6325P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6325P scores 16,346 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6134. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6325P vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.
| Feature | Xeon 6325P | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+30% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 24.75 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 8 MB+540% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 16,346 | 16,519+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6325P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon 6325P | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon 6325P) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6134).
| Feature | Xeon 6325P | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon 6325P was priced at $281, while the Xeon Gold 6134 came in at $2214. On launch pricing ($281 vs $2214), Xeon 6325P was $1933 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6325P delivers 58.2 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6134 — making the Xeon 6325P the 154.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6325P | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281-87% | $2214 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.2+676% | 7.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














