Xeon 6507P vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Xeon 6507P
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6507P
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6507P | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6507P | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6507P and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Xeon 6507P
The Xeon 6507P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 31,233 points. Launch price was $765.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon 6507P and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6507P versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon 6507P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6507P scores 31,233 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 16,500 (8.7% advantage for the Xeon 6507P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,200 vs 2,886, a 27% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,500 vs 14,136 (12.3% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6507P vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.
| Feature | Xeon 6507P | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB (total)+50% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 31,233 | 31,508 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,000+9% | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,200 | 2,886+31% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,500 | 14,136+13% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6507P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6507P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6507P) vs 20 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — the Xeon 6507P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Beechnut City platform (Xeon 6507P) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).
| Feature | Xeon 6507P | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | LPDDR5x-8000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+340% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6507P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Xeon 6507P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6507P targets Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Xeon 6507P rivals EPYC 9004; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.
| Feature | Xeon 6507P | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server | Enterprise AI Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 6507P and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
