PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6507P vs Xeon W-3245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6507P vs Xeon W-3245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6507P

2025

Why buy it

✅+62.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+118.2% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅37.5% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-3245

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,353 vs 2,200).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,199 MSRP, while Xeon 6507P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon 6507P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6507P better than Xeon W-3245?

Yes. Xeon 6507P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6507P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

There is no clear productivity winner in the data we have.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6507P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3245 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6507P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-3245 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6507P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and 118.2% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 22 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6507P vs Xeon W-3245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6507P

The Xeon 6507P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 31,233 points. Launch price was $765.

Xeon W-3245

The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6507P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3245 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6507P versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3245 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon 6507P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon W-3245 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6507P scores 31,233 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon 6507P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 18,000 (0% advantage for the Xeon W-3245). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,200 vs 1,353, a 47.7% lead for the Xeon 6507P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,500 vs 11,698 (6.6% advantage for the Xeon 6507P). L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6507P vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.

Feature	Xeon 6507P	Xeon W-3245
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.6 GHz+7%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	48 MB (total)+118%	22 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	16 MB+700%
Process	Intel 3 nm-79%	14 nm
Architecture	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	31,233	31,089
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,000	18,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,200+63%	1,353
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,500+7%	11,698

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6507P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6507P versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245 — the Xeon 6507P supports 118.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6507P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6507P) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6507P) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon 6507P offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Beechnut City platform (Xeon 6507P) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).

Feature	Xeon 6507P	Xeon W-3245
Socket	LGA4710	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400+118%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+300%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+38%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6507P targets Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon 6507P rivals EPYC 9004; Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Xeon 6507P	Xeon W-3245
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server	Professional Workstation