Xeon 6960P vs Core i5-10400F
Xeon 6960P
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6960P
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6960P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,625) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6960P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+841%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,625) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6960P and Core i5-10400F
Xeon 6960P
The Xeon 6960P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2024-09-24. It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 432 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA7529. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 130,659 points. Launch price was $9,625.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6960P packs 72 cores / 144 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon 6960P has 66 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6960P versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon 6960P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6960P scores 130,659 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 163.7% lead for the Xeon 6960P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,100 vs 1,454, a 36.4% lead for the Xeon 6960P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 60,000 vs 5,783 (164.8% advantage for the Xeon 6960P). L3 cache: 432 MB (total) on the Xeon 6960P vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Xeon 6960P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 72 / 144+1100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 432 MB (total)+3500% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 130,659+903% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,100+44% | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 60,000+938% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6960P uses the LGA7529 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6960P versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Xeon 6960P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6960P supports up to 3072 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (Xeon 6960P) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 96 (Xeon 6960P) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Xeon 6960P offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series (Xeon 6960P) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Xeon 6960P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA7529 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 3072 GB+2300% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+500% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6960P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6960P targets Server, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Xeon 6960P rivals EPYC 9654; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Xeon 6960P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6960P launched at $9625 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($9625 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $9523 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6960P delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 161.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6960P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9625 | $160-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $9625 | $102-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 127.7+839% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 6960P and Core i5-10400F
