Xeon Bronze 3104 vs Xeon E5-1603 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Bronze 3104 vs Xeon E5-1603 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Bronze 3104 vs Xeon E5-1603 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Bronze 3104

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 85W instead of 140W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-1603 v4

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,355 vs 4,383).
❌64.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 85W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Bronze 3104 better than Xeon E5-1603 v4?

Yes. Xeon Bronze 3104 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Bronze 3104 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Bronze 3104 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Bronze 3104 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Bronze 3104 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Bronze 3104 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Bronze 3104 vs Xeon E5-1603 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Bronze 3104

The Xeon Bronze 3104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $213.

Xeon E5-1603 v4

The Xeon E5-1603 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Passmark benchmark score: 4,355 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Bronze 3104 is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Bronze 3104 scores 4,383 against the Xeon E5-1603 v4's 4,355 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3104.

Feature	Xeon Bronze 3104	Xeon E5-1603 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	—
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8.25 MB	—
L2 Cache	6 MB	—
Process	14 nm	—
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	—
PassMark	4,383	4,355