Xeon D-1622 vs FX-8370
Xeon D-1622
FX-8370
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon D-1622 is positioned at rank 452 and the FX-8370 is on rank 583, so the Xeon D-1622 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-1622
Performance Per Dollar FX-8370
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon D-1622 | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($170) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon D-1622 | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+69%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($170) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon D-1622 and FX-8370
Xeon D-1622
The Xeon D-1622 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,205 points. Launch price was $170.
FX-8370
The FX-8370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,184 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Xeon D-1622 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8370 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1622 versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370 — a 29.3% clock advantage for the FX-8370 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Xeon D-1622 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8370 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-1622 scores 6,205 against the FX-8370's 6,184 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon D-1622.
| Feature | Xeon D-1622 | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+34% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8192 kB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 6,205 | 6,184 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 520 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,050 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon D-1622 uses the FCBGA1667 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8370 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon D-1622 | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1667 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon D-1622) / AMD-V (FX-8370). Primary use case: FX-8370 targets Legacy Gaming. Direct competitor: FX-8370 rivals Core i5-6400.
| Feature | Xeon D-1622 | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon D-1622 launched at $195 MSRP, while the FX-8370 debuted at $199. At current prices ($170 vs $100), the FX-8370 is $70 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon D-1622 delivers 36.5 pts/$ vs 61.8 pts/$ for the FX-8370 — making the FX-8370 the 51.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon D-1622 | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $195-2% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $100-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.5 | 61.8+69% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon D-1622 and FX-8370
