Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E3-1280 v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E3-1280 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E3-1280 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1715TER

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 72W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1280 v6 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon E3-1280 v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,093 vs 9,104).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌44% higher power demand at 72W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1715TER better than Xeon E3-1280 v6?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E3-1280 v6 is ahead with a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1715TER pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Xeon D-1715TER also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1715TER is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1715TER still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-1715TER comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1715TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E3-1280 v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1715TER

The Xeon D-1715TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,104 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E3-1280 v6

The Xeon E3-1280 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 72 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,093 points. Launch price was $612.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon D-1715TER and Xeon E3-1280 v6 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1715TER versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1280 v6 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1280 v6 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Xeon D-1715TER uses the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E3-1280 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-1715TER scores 9,104 against the Xeon E3-1280 v6's 9,093 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon D-1715TER. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1715TER vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1280 v6.

Feature	Xeon D-1715TER	Xeon E3-1280 v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.2 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.9 GHz+63%
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)+25%	8 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	9,104	9,093

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1715TER uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1280 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.