Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E5-2643 v2

Intel

Xeon D-1715TER

4 Cores8 Thrd50 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2643 v2

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E5-2643 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E5-2643 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E5-2643 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1715TER

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2643 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (9,104 vs 9,172).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 15 MB).

Xeon E5-2643 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 10 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2643 v2 better than Xeon D-1715TER?
Yes. Xeon E5-2643 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2643 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2643 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 10 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-2643 v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2643 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1715TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E5-2643 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon D-1715TER

The Xeon D-1715TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,104 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon E5-2643 v2

The Xeon E5-2643 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,172 points. Launch price was $2,200.

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1715TER packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2643 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2643 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1715TER versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 v2 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2643 v2 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon D-1715TER uses the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2643 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-1715TER scores 9,104 against the Xeon E5-2643 v2's 9,172 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2643 v2. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1715TER vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2643 v2.

FeatureXeon D-1715TERXeon E5-2643 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz+46%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)
15 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
9,104
9,172
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1715TER uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2643 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon D-1715TERXeon E5-2643 v2
Socket
FCBGA2227
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%