Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E5-4648 V3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E5-4648 V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E5-4648 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1715TER

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 50W instead of 105W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4648 V3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 30 MB).

Xeon E5-4648 V3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 10 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,061 vs 9,104).
❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Xeon D-1715TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌110% higher power demand at 105W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1715TER better than Xeon E5-4648 V3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-4648 V3 is ahead with a 16.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1715TER pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4648 V3 also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1715TER is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1715TER is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4648 V3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon D-1715TER comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4648 V3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 16.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4648 V3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (53.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1715TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon D-1715TER vs Xeon E5-4648 V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1715TER

The Xeon D-1715TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,104 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-4648 V3

The Xeon E5-4648 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,061 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1715TER packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4648 V3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1715TER versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4648 V3 — a 45.6% clock advantage for the Xeon D-1715TER (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Xeon D-1715TER uses the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-1715TER scores 9,104 against the Xeon E5-4648 V3's 9,061 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon D-1715TER. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1715TER vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4648 V3.

Feature	Xeon D-1715TER	Xeon E5-4648 V3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+41%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	9,104	9,061

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1715TER uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.