Xeon D-1736NT
VS
Core Ultra 7 265U

Xeon D-1736NT vs Core Ultra 7 265U

Intel

Xeon D-1736NT

8 Cores16 Thrd67 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 265U

12 Cores14 Thrd14 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-1736NT

#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
103%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#114
Xeon D-1736NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265U

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
102%
#147
Core Ultra 7 265U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
95%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
94%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon D-1736NT is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon D-1736NTCore Ultra 7 265U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-U (2025) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 265U ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon D-1736NTCore Ultra 7 265U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon D-1736NT and Core Ultra 7 265U

Intel

Xeon D-1736NT

The Xeon D-1736NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,826 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265U

The Core Ultra 7 265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,900 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1736NT packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1736NT versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265U — a 40.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265U (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265U is built on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1736NT scores 17,826 against the Core Ultra 7 265U's 17,900 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265U. L3 cache: 15 MB on the Xeon D-1736NT vs 12 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265U.

FeatureXeon D-1736NTCore Ultra 7 265U
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
12 / 14+50%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
5.3 GHz+51%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+13%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
15 MB+25%
12 MB
Process
10 nm
5 nm-50%
Architecture
Arrow Lake-U (2025)
PassMark
17,826
17,900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1736NT uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon D-1736NTCore Ultra 7 265U
Socket
FCBGA2227
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%