Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Gold 6126

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Gold 6126 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Gold 6126: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1736NT

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 67W instead of 125W, a 58W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6126 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 19 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6126

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 15 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,492 vs 17,826).
❌86.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 67W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1736NT better than Xeon Gold 6126?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6126 is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1736NT pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6126 also has the bigger cache pool with 28.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1736NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1736NT still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-1736NT comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1736NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Gold 6126 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1736NT

The Xeon D-1736NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,826 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6126

The Xeon Gold 6126 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,492 points. Launch price was $1,776.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1736NT packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6126 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 6126 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1736NT versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6126 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6126 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6126 is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1736NT scores 17,826 against the Xeon Gold 6126's 17,492 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon D-1736NT. L3 cache: 15 MB on the Xeon D-1736NT vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6126.

Feature	Xeon D-1736NT	Xeon Gold 6126
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+4%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	15 MB	19.25 MB+28%
L2 Cache	—	12 MB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	17,826+2%	17,492

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1736NT uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6126 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.