Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Silver 4214R

Intel

Xeon D-1736NT

8 Cores16 Thrd67 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4214R

12 Cores24 Thrd100 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Silver 4214R Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Silver 4214R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Silver 4214R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1736NT

2022

Why buy it

  • +1.9% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 67W instead of 100W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4214R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4214R

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (17,489 vs 17,826).
  • 49.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 67W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1736NT better than Xeon Silver 4214R?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4214R is ahead with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1736NT pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1736NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon D-1736NT still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-1736NT comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1736NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Silver 4214R Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon D-1736NT

The Xeon D-1736NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,826 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4214R

The Xeon Silver 4214R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,489 points. Launch price was $705.

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1736NT packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4214R offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4214R has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1736NT versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4214R — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4214R is built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1736NT scores 17,826 against the Xeon Silver 4214R's 17,489 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon D-1736NT. L3 cache: 15 MB on the Xeon D-1736NT vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4214R.

FeatureXeon D-1736NTXeon Silver 4214R
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+13%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
15 MB
16.5 MB+10%
L2 Cache
12 MB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
17,826+2%
17,489
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1736NT uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4214R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon D-1736NTXeon Silver 4214R
Socket
FCBGA2227
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2400
Max RAM Capacity
1024
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon D-1736NT) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4214R). Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4214R rivals EPYC 7302P.

FeatureXeon D-1736NTXeon Silver 4214R
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d