Xeon D-1747NTE vs Core Ultra 9 288V

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-1747NTE

#63

EPYC 4345P

MSRP: $329|Avg: $329

135%

#64

EPYC 4344P

MSRP: $329|Avg: $314

132%

#65

EPYC 4364P

MSRP: $399|Avg: $334

126%

#66

EPYC 4585PX

MSRP: $699|Avg: $826

124%

#67

EPYC 4545P

MSRP: $549|Avg: $595

122%

#71

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

MSRP: $400|Avg: $343

107%

#73

EPYC 4484PX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

104%

#78

Xeon D-1747NTE

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#86

Xeon Platinum 8260

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 288V

#173

Core Ultra 5 238V

MSRP: $454|Avg: $454

119%

#176

Core i9-13900HK

MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A

116%

#178

Core i7-1360P

MSRP: $480|Avg: $280

114%

#179

Core i7-1260P

MSRP: $432|Avg: $432

114%

#184

Core Ultra 7 266V

MSRP: $520|Avg: $520

110%

#185

Ryzen 7 5825C

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

108%

#187

Core Ultra 9 288V

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

100%

#188

Core i7-10870H

MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon D-1747NTE is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.

Insight	Xeon D-1747NTE	Core Ultra 9 288V
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($600)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Legacy / 10 nm)	✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 9 288V ($600), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($600 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.

Insight	Xeon D-1747NTE	Core Ultra 9 288V
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($600)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon D-1747NTE Benchmark Check

Core Ultra 9 288V Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon D-1747NTE and Core Ultra 9 288V

Xeon D-1747NTE

The Xeon D-1747NTE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,279 points. Launch price was $800.

Core Ultra 9 288V

The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1747NTE packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 288V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon D-1747NTE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1747NTE versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V — a 37.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 288V is built on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1747NTE scores 20,279 against the Core Ultra 9 288V's 20,280 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V. L3 cache: 15 MB on the Xeon D-1747NTE vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V.

Feature	Xeon D-1747NTE	Core Ultra 9 288V
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	5.1 GHz+46%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	15 MB+25%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	2.5 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	3 nm-70%
Architecture	—	Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark	20,279	20,280
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,300
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1747NTE uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon D-1747NTE	Core Ultra 9 288V
Socket	FCBGA2227	FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	—	LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon D-1747NTE) / true (Core Ultra 9 288V). The Core Ultra 9 288V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140V), while the Xeon D-1747NTE requires a dedicated GPU.