Xeon D-1747NTE vs Xeon Gold 6138T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1747NTE vs Xeon Gold 6138T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1747NTE vs Xeon Gold 6138T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1747NTE

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,279 vs 20,356).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 28 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6138T

2017

Why buy it

✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 15 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $2,742 MSRP, while Xeon D-1747NTE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6138T better than Xeon D-1747NTE?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6138T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6138T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6138T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 83.3% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6138T is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6138T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $2,742 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1747NTE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-1747NTE vs Xeon Gold 6138T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1747NTE

The Xeon D-1747NTE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,279 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6138T

The Xeon Gold 6138T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,356 points. Launch price was $2,742.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1747NTE packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138T offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138T has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1747NTE versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138T — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6138T is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1747NTE scores 20,279 against the Xeon Gold 6138T's 20,356 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6138T. L3 cache: 15 MB on the Xeon D-1747NTE vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138T.

Feature	Xeon D-1747NTE	Xeon Gold 6138T
Cores / Threads	10 / 20	20 / 40+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	15 MB	27.5 MB+83%
L2 Cache	—	20 MB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	20,279	20,356
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,030
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,988

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1747NTE uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon D-1747NTE	Xeon Gold 6138T
Socket	FCBGA2227	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	6
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	48