Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon D-1747NTE

Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon D-1747NTE Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 5980HS

8 / 16

20,257

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-1747NTE

10 / 20

20,279

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon D-1747NTE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon D-1747NTE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 5980HS

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Xeon D-1747NTE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,257 vs 20,279).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1747NTE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon D-1747NTE

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1747NTE better than Ryzen 9 5980HS?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1747NTE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5980HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1747NTE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1747NTE still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-1747NTE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1747NTE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon D-1747NTE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 5980HS

The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1747NTE

The Xeon D-1747NTE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,279 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5980HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-1747NTE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1747NTE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1747NTE — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HS (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5980HS is built on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5980HS scores 20,257 against the Xeon D-1747NTE's 20,279 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon D-1747NTE. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HS vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1747NTE.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5980HS	Xeon D-1747NTE
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+37%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+20%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+7%	15 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)	—
PassMark	20,257	20,279

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1747NTE uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5980HS	Xeon D-1747NTE
Socket	FP6	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-4266	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS) / not specified (Xeon D-1747NTE). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Xeon D-1747NTE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.