Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v4

Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 5980HS

8 / 16

20,257

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4667 v4

18 / 36

20,319

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 5980HS

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Xeon E5-4667 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,257 vs 20,319).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5980HS better than Xeon E5-4667 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4667 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5980HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4667 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5980HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 9 5980HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 5980HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 5980HS

The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5980HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HS (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5980HS scores 20,257 against the Xeon E5-4667 v4's 20,319 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HS vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5980HS	Xeon E5-4667 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+60%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+36%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	45 MB+181%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+11278%	4.5 MB
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	20,257	20,319

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5980HS	Xeon E5-4667 v4
Socket	FP6	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-4266	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS) / not specified (Xeon E5-4667 v4). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.