EPYC 8024P vs Ryzen 9 5980HS

AMD

EPYC 8024P

8 Cores16 Thrd90 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5980HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 5980HS

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +22.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while EPYC 8024P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (20,257 vs 20,455).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while EPYC 8024P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8024P better than Ryzen 9 5980HS?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 8024P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5980HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8024P is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 8024P still looks like the safer overall buy. EPYC 8024P is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 1% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8024P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 8024PRyzen 9 5980HS
1080p
low144 FPS277 FPS
medium117 FPS250 FPS
high100 FPS210 FPS
ultra81 FPS180 FPS
1440p
low127 FPS241 FPS
medium103 FPS195 FPS
high84 FPS159 FPS
ultra66 FPS140 FPS
4K
low62 FPS168 FPS
medium53 FPS138 FPS
high42 FPS106 FPS
ultra33 FPS93 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 8024PRyzen 9 5980HS
1080p
low336 FPS506 FPS
medium300 FPS464 FPS
high237 FPS390 FPS
ultra189 FPS342 FPS
1440p
low284 FPS485 FPS
medium261 FPS407 FPS
high212 FPS349 FPS
ultra166 FPS294 FPS
4K
low182 FPS334 FPS
medium169 FPS288 FPS
high138 FPS263 FPS
ultra109 FPS227 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 8024PRyzen 9 5980HS
1080p
low511 FPS506 FPS
medium511 FPS506 FPS
high511 FPS506 FPS
ultra511 FPS506 FPS
1440p
low511 FPS506 FPS
medium511 FPS506 FPS
high511 FPS506 FPS
ultra486 FPS463 FPS
4K
low422 FPS506 FPS
medium334 FPS469 FPS
high298 FPS413 FPS
ultra245 FPS348 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 8024PRyzen 9 5980HS
1080p
low511 FPS506 FPS
medium511 FPS506 FPS
high511 FPS506 FPS
ultra511 FPS506 FPS
1440p
low511 FPS506 FPS
medium511 FPS506 FPS
high511 FPS506 FPS
ultra461 FPS477 FPS
4K
low511 FPS506 FPS
medium471 FPS463 FPS
high413 FPS410 FPS
ultra343 FPS346 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8024P and Ryzen 9 5980HS

AMD

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5980HS

The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8024P and Ryzen 9 5980HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 8024P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Ryzen 9 5980HS's 20,257 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 8024P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HS.

FeatureEPYC 8024PRyzen 9 5980HS
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.8 GHz+60%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+100%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Siena (2023−2024)
Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark
20,455
20,257
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 8024PRyzen 9 5980HS
Socket
SP6
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 8024P) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the EPYC 8024P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.

FeatureEPYC 8024PRyzen 9 5980HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics (8CU)
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile High-End