EPYC 8024P vs Ryzen 9 5980HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8024P vs Ryzen 9 5980HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8024P vs Ryzen 9 5980HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 5980HS

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while EPYC 8024P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,257 vs 20,455).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while EPYC 8024P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8024P better than Ryzen 9 5980HS?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 8024P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5980HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8024P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8024P still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 8024P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8024P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8024P vs Ryzen 9 5980HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

Ryzen 9 5980HS

The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8024P and Ryzen 9 5980HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 8024P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Ryzen 9 5980HS's 20,257 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 8024P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HS.

Feature	EPYC 8024P	Ryzen 9 5980HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.8 GHz+60%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark	20,455	20,257

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 8024P	Ryzen 9 5980HS
Socket	SP6	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 8024P) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the EPYC 8024P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.