
EPYC 8024P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5980HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8024P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while EPYC 8024P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,257 vs 20,455).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while EPYC 8024P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
EPYC 8024P
2023Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while EPYC 8024P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,257 vs 20,455).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while EPYC 8024P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 8024P better than Ryzen 9 5980HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8024P | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8024P | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 336 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 227 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8024P | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 486 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 348 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8024P | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 477 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8024P and Ryzen 9 5980HS

EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P
The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 9 5980HS
Ryzen 9 5980HS
The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 8024P and Ryzen 9 5980HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 8024P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Ryzen 9 5980HS's 20,257 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 8024P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HS.
| Feature | EPYC 8024P | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 20,455 | 20,257 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 8024P | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 8024P) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the EPYC 8024P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | EPYC 8024P | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (8CU) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












