Core Ultra 9 288V vs Xeon D-1747NTE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 9 288V vs Xeon D-1747NTE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 9 288V vs Xeon D-1747NTE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 9 288V

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 30W instead of 80W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 140V, while Xeon D-1747NTE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1747NTE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $600 MSRP, while Xeon D-1747NTE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1747NTE

2022

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 288V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,279 vs 20,280).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 30W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 9 288V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 288V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 288V better than Xeon D-1747NTE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1747NTE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 9 288V is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 9 288V is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 9 288V is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 9 288V is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 9 288V comes in at an unclear MSRP at $600 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (33.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 9 288V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2227, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 9 288V vs Xeon D-1747NTE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 9 288V

The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1747NTE

The Xeon D-1747NTE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,279 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 288V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-1747NTE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1747NTE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1747NTE — a 37.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 288V is built on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 288V scores 20,280 against the Xeon D-1747NTE's 20,279 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1747NTE.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 288V	Xeon D-1747NTE
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+46%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+32%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	15 MB+25%
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)	—
Process	3 nm-70%	10 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	—
PassMark	20,280	20,279
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,300	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-1747NTE uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 288V	Xeon D-1747NTE
Socket	FCBGA2833	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5X-8533	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core Ultra 9 288V) / not specified (Xeon D-1747NTE). The Core Ultra 9 288V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140V), while the Xeon D-1747NTE requires a dedicated GPU.