
Core Ultra 9 288V

Ryzen 5 5500X3D
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 5 5500X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 5 5500X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 5 5500X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 105W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 140V, while Ryzen 5 5500X3D needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 96 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 109.4 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $185 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $415 less on MSRP ($185 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.4 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($185 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 288V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,231 vs 20,280).
- ❌250% higher power demand at 105W vs 30W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 9 288V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 288V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 288V better than Ryzen 5 5500X3D?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 5 5500X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 9 288V
The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 5500X3D
The Ryzen 5 5500X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 June 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,231 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 288V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5500X3D offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 9 288V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5500X3D — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5500X3D uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 288V scores 20,280 against the Ryzen 5 5500X3D's 20,231 — a 0.2% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5500X3D.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 5 5500X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+27% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+10% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+400% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 20,280 | 20,231 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5500X3D uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 5 5500X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core Ultra 9 288V) / not specified (Ryzen 5 5500X3D). The Core Ultra 9 288V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140V), while the Ryzen 5 5500X3D requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 5 5500X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 140V | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 9 288V was priced at $600, while the Ryzen 5 5500X3D came in at $185. On launch pricing ($600 vs $185), Ryzen 5 5500X3D was $415 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 288V delivers 33.8 pts/$ vs 109.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5500X3D — making the Ryzen 5 5500X3D the 105.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 5 5500X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $185-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.8 | 109.4+224% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














