Ryzen 5 8640U vs Xeon D-1747NTE

Ryzen 5 8640U vs Xeon D-1747NTE Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 8640U

6 / 12

20,274

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-1747NTE

10 / 20

20,279

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 8640U vs Xeon D-1747NTE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 8640U vs Xeon D-1747NTE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 8640U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 80W, a 52W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Xeon D-1747NTE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,274 vs 20,279).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1747NTE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon D-1747NTE

2022

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌185.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 8640U better than Xeon D-1747NTE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1747NTE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 8640U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1747NTE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 8640U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 8640U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 8640U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2227, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 8640U vs Xeon D-1747NTE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 8640U

The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1747NTE

The Xeon D-1747NTE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,279 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 8640U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1747NTE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1747NTE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1747NTE — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640U is built on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640U scores 20,274 against the Xeon D-1747NTE's 20,279 — a 0% lead for the Xeon D-1747NTE. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640U vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1747NTE.

Feature	Ryzen 5 8640U	Xeon D-1747NTE
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+40%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+40%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+7%	15 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm-60%	10 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)	—
PassMark	20,274	20,279
Cinebench R23 Multi	10,675	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,519	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,308	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 8640U uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1747NTE uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 8640U	Xeon D-1747NTE
Socket	FP8	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-7500	—
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U) / not specified (Xeon D-1747NTE). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Xeon D-1747NTE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.