EPYC 8024P vs Ryzen 5 8640U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8024P vs Ryzen 5 8640U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8024P vs Ryzen 5 8640U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌221.4% higher power demand at 90W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 8640U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 90W, a 62W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while EPYC 8024P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,274 vs 20,455).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8024P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 8640U better than EPYC 8024P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 8024P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 8640U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8024P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 8640U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 8640U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 8640U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 8024P vs Ryzen 5 8640U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

Ryzen 5 8640U

The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8024P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 8024P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U — a 48.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 8024P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Ryzen 5 8640U's 20,274 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 8024P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640U.

Feature	EPYC 8024P	Ryzen 5 8640U
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.9 GHz+63%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+46%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
PassMark	20,455	20,274
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	10,675
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,519
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,308

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 8024P	Ryzen 5 8640U
Socket	SP6	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	LPDDR5x-7500
Max RAM Capacity	—	256 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 8024P) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the EPYC 8024P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.