
Ryzen 5 8640U

Xeon E5-4667 v4
Ryzen 5 8640U vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 8640U vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 8640U vs Xeon E5-4667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 135W, a 107W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Xeon E5-4667 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,274 vs 20,319).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
Xeon E5-4667 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌382.1% higher power demand at 135W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8640U better than Xeon E5-4667 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 8640U vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 8640U
The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v4
The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8640U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 — a 48.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640U uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640U scores 20,274 against the Xeon E5-4667 v4's 20,319 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640U vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640U | Xeon E5-4667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 18 / 36+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+63% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+59% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 45 MB+181% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4.5 MB+350% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 20,274 | 20,319 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,675 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,519 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,308 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8640U uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640U | Xeon E5-4667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7500 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U) / not specified (Xeon E5-4667 v4). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640U | Xeon E5-4667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 760M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













