Xeon D-1747NTE vs Ryzen 5 8640U

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Xeon D-1747NTE

10 / 20

20,279

0.0%

20,274

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-1747NTE

#63

EPYC 4345P

MSRP: $329|Avg: $329

135%

#64

EPYC 4344P

MSRP: $329|Avg: $314

132%

#65

EPYC 4364P

MSRP: $399|Avg: $334

126%

#66

EPYC 4585PX

MSRP: $699|Avg: $826

124%

#67

EPYC 4545P

MSRP: $549|Avg: $595

122%

#71

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

MSRP: $400|Avg: $343

107%

#73

EPYC 4484PX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

104%

#78

Xeon D-1747NTE

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#86

Xeon Platinum 8260

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon D-1747NTE is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.

Insight	Xeon D-1747NTE	Ryzen 5 8640U
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Legacy / 10 nm)	✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 8640U ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.

Insight	Xeon D-1747NTE	Ryzen 5 8640U
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon D-1747NTE Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 8640U Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon D-1747NTE and Ryzen 5 8640U

Xeon D-1747NTE

The Xeon D-1747NTE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,279 points. Launch price was $800.

Ryzen 5 8640U

The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1747NTE packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon D-1747NTE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1747NTE versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640U is built on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1747NTE scores 20,279 against the Ryzen 5 8640U's 20,274 — a 0% lead for the Xeon D-1747NTE. L3 cache: 15 MB on the Xeon D-1747NTE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640U.

Feature	Xeon D-1747NTE	Ryzen 5 8640U
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.9 GHz+40%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	15 MB	16 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	4 nm-60%
Architecture	—	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
PassMark	20,279	20,274
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	10,675
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,519
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,308

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1747NTE uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon D-1747NTE	Ryzen 5 8640U
Socket	FCBGA2227	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	LPDDR5x-7500
Max RAM Capacity	—	256 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	✅
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon D-1747NTE) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Xeon D-1747NTE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.