Xeon D-1848TER vs Xeon E5-2689 v4

Intel

Xeon D-1848TER

10 Cores20 Thrd57 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2689 v4

10 Cores20 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Xeon D-1848TER vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1848TER vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1848TER vs Xeon E5-2689 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1848TER

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 57W instead of 165W, a 108W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2689 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (16,952 vs 17,084).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon E5-2689 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 15 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $2,723 MSRP, while Xeon D-1848TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 189.5% higher power demand at 165W vs 57W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2689 v4 better than Xeon D-1848TER?
Yes. Xeon E5-2689 v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2689 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2689 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 15 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-2689 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2689 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $2,723 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1848TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-1848TER vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon D-1848TER

The Xeon D-1848TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,952 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon E5-2689 v4

The Xeon E5-2689 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,084 points. Launch price was $2,723.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon D-1848TER and Xeon E5-2689 v4 share an identical 10-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1848TER versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2689 v4 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2689 v4 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2689 v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1848TER scores 16,952 against the Xeon E5-2689 v4's 17,084 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2689 v4. L3 cache: 15360 kB on the Xeon D-1848TER vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2689 v4.

FeatureXeon D-1848TERXeon E5-2689 v4
Cores / Threads
10 / 20
10 / 20
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.1 GHz+55%
L3 Cache
15360 kB
25 MB+67%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB
Process
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
16,952
17,084
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1848TER uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon D-1848TERXeon E5-2689 v4
Socket
FCBGA2227
LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0