Xeon D-1848TER vs Xeon W-3223

Intel

Xeon D-1848TER

10 Cores20 Thrd57 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3223

8 Cores16 Thrd160 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Xeon D-1848TER vs Xeon W-3223 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1848TER vs Xeon W-3223 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1848TER vs Xeon W-3223: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1848TER

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 57W instead of 160W, a 103W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3223 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (16,952 vs 16,956).

Xeon W-3223

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Xeon D-1848TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 180.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 57W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3223 better than Xeon D-1848TER?
Yes. Xeon W-3223 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 21.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3223 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3223 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-3223 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3223 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (57.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1848TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-1848TER vs Xeon W-3223 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon D-1848TER

The Xeon D-1848TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,952 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon W-3223

The Xeon W-3223 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,956 points. Launch price was $749.

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1848TER packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-3223 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-1848TER has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1848TER versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-3223 — a 30.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3223 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon W-3223 is built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1848TER scores 16,952 against the Xeon W-3223's 16,956 — a 0% lead for the Xeon W-3223. L3 cache: 15360 kB on the Xeon D-1848TER vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3223.

FeatureXeon D-1848TERXeon W-3223
Cores / Threads
10 / 20+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
4.2 GHz+35%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
15360 kB
16.5 MB+10%
L2 Cache
8 MB
Process
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
16,952
16,956
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1848TER uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3223 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon D-1848TERXeon W-3223
Socket
FCBGA2227
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0