
Xeon D-1848TER
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5118
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon D-1848TER
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 57W instead of 105W, a 48W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5118 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5118
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,744 vs 16,952).
- ❌84.2% higher power demand at 105W vs 57W.
Xeon D-1848TER
2023Xeon Gold 5118
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 57W instead of 105W, a 48W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5118 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,744 vs 16,952).
- ❌84.2% higher power demand at 105W vs 57W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon D-1848TER better than Xeon Gold 5118?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon D-1848TER | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon D-1848TER | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 95 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon D-1848TER | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 404 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon D-1848TER | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 311 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon D-1848TER and Xeon Gold 5118

Xeon D-1848TER
Xeon D-1848TER
The Xeon D-1848TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,952 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 5118
Xeon Gold 5118
The Xeon Gold 5118 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,744 points. Launch price was $1,273.
Processing Power
The Xeon D-1848TER packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5118 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 5118 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1848TER versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5118 — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5118 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5118 is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1848TER scores 16,952 against the Xeon Gold 5118's 16,744 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon D-1848TER. L3 cache: 15360 kB on the Xeon D-1848TER vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5118.
| Feature | Xeon D-1848TER | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 15360 kB | 16.5 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | — | 12 MB |
| Process | — | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 16,952+1% | 16,744 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon D-1848TER uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5118 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon D-1848TER | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2227 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon D-1848TER) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5118). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5118 rivals EPYC 7301.
| Feature | Xeon D-1848TER | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












