Xeon D-2775TE vs Xeon Gold 5317

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-2775TE vs Xeon Gold 5317 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-2775TE vs Xeon Gold 5317: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-2775TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5317 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,299 vs 27,448).

Xeon Gold 5317

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,088 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5317 better than Xeon D-2775TE?

Yes. Xeon Gold 5317 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5317 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5317 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5317 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5317 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,088 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2775TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and 38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-2775TE vs Xeon Gold 5317 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-2775TE

The Xeon D-2775TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,299 points. Launch price was $1,751.

Xeon Gold 5317

The Xeon Gold 5317 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,448 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-2775TE packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5317 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon D-2775TE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2775TE versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5317 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5317 (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon D-2775TE uses the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5317 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-2775TE scores 27,299 against the Xeon Gold 5317's 27,448 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 5317. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2775TE vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5317.

Feature	Xeon D-2775TE	Xeon Gold 5317
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)+39%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	27,299	27,448

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-2775TE uses the FCBGA2579 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5317 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.