
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Xeon D-2775TE
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon D-2775TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon D-2775TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon D-2775TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +42.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 100W, a 92W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon D-2775TE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon D-2775TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,299 vs 27,318).
- ❌1150% higher power demand at 100W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Xeon D-2775TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon D-2775TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2775TE
The Xeon D-2775TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,299 points. Launch price was $1,751.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2775TE offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2775TE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2775TE — a 50.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS scores 27,318 against the Xeon D-2775TE's 27,299 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2775TE.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+68% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+100% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 25 MB (total)+56% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+540% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 27,318 | 27,299 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,605 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,348 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) / not specified (Xeon D-2775TE). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon D-2775TE requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













