Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS scores 27,318 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 27,487 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,605 vs 1,040, a 85.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,348 vs 9,000 (13.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+30% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+18% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,318 | 27,487 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,605+150% | 1,040 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,348+15% | 9,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
