Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 180W, a 172W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen Threadripper 1950X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 10,348).
❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2150% higher power demand at 180W vs 8W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 15% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP7/FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS scores 27,318 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 27,487 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,605 vs 1,040, a 85.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,348 vs 9,000 (13.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+30%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+18%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	8 MB	512K (per core)+6300%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	27,318	27,487
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,605+150%	1,040
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,348+15%	9,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X).

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Socket	FP7/FP8	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+110%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	256 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation.