Xeon D-2799 vs Xeon Gold 5318Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-2799 vs Xeon Gold 5318Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-2799 vs Xeon Gold 5318Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-2799

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 129W instead of 165W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5318Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 28,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).

Xeon Gold 5318Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌27.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 129W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5318Y better than Xeon D-2799?

Yes. Xeon Gold 5318Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 42.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5318Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5318Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 42.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5318Y still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 5318Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2799 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-2799 vs Xeon Gold 5318Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-2799

The Xeon D-2799 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 129 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 33,792 points. Launch price was $1,972.

Xeon Gold 5318Y

The Xeon Gold 5318Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,139 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-2799 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5318Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5318Y has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon D-2799 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5318Y — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon D-2799 uses the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5318Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-2799 scores 33,792 against the Xeon Gold 5318Y's 33,139 — a 2% lead for the Xeon D-2799. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,000 vs 28,500 (35.1% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318Y). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,959 vs 1,251, a 44.1% lead for the Xeon D-2799 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,895 vs 21,846 (168.1% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318Y). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2799 vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5318Y.

Feature	Xeon D-2799	Xeon Gold 5318Y
Cores / Threads	20 / 40	24 / 48+20%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	36 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	33,792+2%	33,139
Cinebench R23 Multi	20,000	28,500+43%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,959+57%	1,251
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,895	21,846+1053%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-2799 uses the FCBGA2579 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5318Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon D-2799 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 5318Y — the Xeon D-2799 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5318Y supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon D-2799) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5318Y). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon D-2799) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 5318Y) — the Xeon Gold 5318Y offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Ice Lake-D (Xeon D-2799) and C621A,Ice Lake-SP (Xeon Gold 5318Y).

Feature	Xeon D-2799	Xeon Gold 5318Y
Socket	FCBGA2579	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+9%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	1024 GB	6144 GB+500%
RAM Channels	4	8+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	32	64+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon D-2799 targets Edge Server / Networking, Xeon Gold 5318Y targets Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2799 rivals EPYC 7302; Xeon Gold 5318Y rivals Xeon Silver 4316.