Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon D-2799

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon D-2799 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

12 / 24

33,619

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon D-2799

20 / 40

33,792

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon D-2799 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon D-2799: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 129W, a 101W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Xeon D-2799 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon D-2799.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2799, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.

Xeon D-2799

2022

Why buy it

✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 22,246).
❌360.7% higher power demand at 129W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than Xeon D-2799?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-2799 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the stronger fit. You are getting 11.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2579, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 20/40. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon D-2799 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon D-2799

The Xeon D-2799 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 129 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 33,792 points. Launch price was $1,972.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon D-2799 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2799 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon D-2799 — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon D-2799 uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 33,619 against the Xeon D-2799's 33,792 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon D-2799. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,246 vs 20,000 (10.6% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,864 vs 1,959, a 37.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,012 vs 1,895 (155.2% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2799.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375	Xeon D-2799
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	20 / 40+67%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+50%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	16 MB	30 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process	4 nm-60%	10 nm
Architecture	Strix Point (2024−2025)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	33,619	33,792
Cinebench R23 Multi	22,246+11%	20,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,864+46%	1,959
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,012+692%	1,895

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2799 uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon D-2799 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2799 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 4 (Xeon D-2799). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 32 (Xeon D-2799) — the Xeon D-2799 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) and Ice Lake-D (Xeon D-2799).

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375	Xeon D-2799
Socket	FP8	FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8000+150%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1024 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	32+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon D-2799). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Xeon D-2799 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming, Xeon D-2799 targets Edge Server / Networking. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX; Xeon D-2799 rivals EPYC 7302.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375	Xeon D-2799
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 890M	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming	Edge Server / Networking