Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Gold 6326

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Gold 6326 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

12 / 24

33,619

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Gold 6326

16 / 32

33,764

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Gold 6326 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Gold 6326: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

2025

Why buy it

✅+75.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 28W instead of 185W, a 157W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Xeon Gold 6326 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 6326.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,246 vs 24,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6326, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6326

2021

Why buy it

✅+10.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,631 vs 2,864).
❌560.7% higher power demand at 185W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than Xeon Gold 6326?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6326 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6326 is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Gold 6326 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6326

The Xeon Gold 6326 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,764 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6326 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6326 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6326 — a 37.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6326 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 33,619 against the Xeon Gold 6326's 33,764 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6326. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,246 vs 24,500 (9.6% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6326). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,864 vs 1,631, a 54.9% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,012 vs 16,254 (7.9% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6326). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6326.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375	Xeon Gold 6326
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+46%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.9 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	16 MB	24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-60%	10 nm
Architecture	Strix Point (2024−2025)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	33,619	33,764
Cinebench R23 Multi	22,246	24,500+10%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,864+76%	1,631
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,012	16,254+8%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6326 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Gold 6326 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6326 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6326). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6326) — the Xeon Gold 6326 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) and C621A,Ice Lake-SP (Xeon Gold 6326).

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375	Xeon Gold 6326
Socket	FP8	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8000+150%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	4096 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	64+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6326). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Xeon Gold 6326 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming, Xeon Gold 6326 targets High-core Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX; Xeon Gold 6326 rivals EPYC 7313.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375	Xeon Gold 6326
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 890M	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming	High-core Server