EPYC 7302
VS
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

AMD

EPYC 7302

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

12 Cores24 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7302

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
775%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
6%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
14%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
13%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
13%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
12%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
146%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
130%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
100%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
91%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
91%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7302Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($109)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7302 (2019) relies on 7 nm, 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7302Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($109)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7302 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

AMD

EPYC 7302

The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375's 33,619 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 22,246 (13.2% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,192 vs 2,864, a 82.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,254 vs 15,012 (37.7% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.

FeatureEPYC 7302Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+33%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
5.1 GHz+55%
Base Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+100%
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Strix Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
33,499
33,619
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,500
22,246+14%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,192
2,864+140%
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,254
15,012+46%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) — the EPYC 7302 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375).

FeatureEPYC 7302Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Socket
SP3
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
LPDDR5x-8000+25%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+1500%
256 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+700%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the EPYC 7302 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX.

FeatureEPYC 7302Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 890M
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use
Server / Multi-thread Workstation
Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7302 launched at $978 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 debuted at $0. At current prices ($109 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is $109 cheaper.

FeatureEPYC 7302Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
MSRP
$978
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$109
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
307.3
Release Date
2019
2025