Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 7302

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

12 Cores24 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7302
16 / 32
33,499
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 5 7540U
brand logoRyzen 7 3700X
brand logoRyzen 5 7645HX
brand logoRyzen 9 270
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
12 / 24
33,619
+0.4%
brand logoRyzen 9 4900HS
brand logoRyzen 7 3700X
brand logoRyzen 5 7645HX
brand logoRyzen 9 270
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 7302
low154 FPS
medium126 FPS
high107 FPS
ultra85 FPS
1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low245 FPS
medium230 FPS
high192 FPS
ultra165 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 7302
low356 FPS
medium314 FPS
high262 FPS
ultra213 FPS
1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low262 FPS
medium220 FPS
high194 FPS
ultra173 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 7302
low642 FPS
medium523 FPS
high466 FPS
ultra409 FPS
1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low738 FPS
medium587 FPS
high508 FPS
ultra429 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 7302
low821 FPS
medium745 FPS
high646 FPS
ultra567 FPS
1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low840 FPS
medium809 FPS
high694 FPS
ultra625 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 7302
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 7302
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra297 FPS
1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low300 FPS
medium295 FPS
high279 FPS
ultra266 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 7302
low285 FPS
medium217 FPS
high186 FPS
ultra168 FPS
1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low299 FPS
medium226 FPS
high195 FPS
ultra173 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 7302
low246 FPS
medium219 FPS
high170 FPS
ultra136 FPS
1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low263 FPS
medium233 FPS
high181 FPS
ultra144 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 7302
low299 FPS
medium259 FPS
high237 FPS
ultra193 FPS
1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low271 FPS
medium233 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra179 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 7302
low223 FPS
medium196 FPS
high164 FPS
ultra152 FPS
1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low236 FPS
medium217 FPS
high180 FPS
ultra168 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7302

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
  • ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
  • ✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,500 vs 22,246).
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $978 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌453.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 28W.
  • ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Draws 28W instead of 155W, a 127W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
  • ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while EPYC 7302 needs a discrete GPU.
  • ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 7302.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than EPYC 7302?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7302 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the stronger fit. You are getting 14.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7302 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $978 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7302 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7302

The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375's 33,619 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 22,246 (13.2% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,192 vs 2,864, a 82.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,254 vs 15,012 (37.7% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.

FeatureEPYC 7302Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+33%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
5.1 GHz+55%
Base Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+100%
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Strix Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
33,499
33,619
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,500
22,246+14%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,192
2,864+140%
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,254
15,012+46%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) — the EPYC 7302 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375).

FeatureEPYC 7302Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Socket
SP3
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
LPDDR5x-8000+150%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+1500%
256 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+700%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the EPYC 7302 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX.

FeatureEPYC 7302Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
—
Radeon 890M
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use
Server / Multi-thread Workstation
Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7302 was priced at $978, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($978 vs $0), Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 was $978 cheaper.

FeatureEPYC 7302Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
MSRP
$978
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
34.3
—
Release Date
2019
2025
Search EPYC 7302 on AmazonSearch Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.