Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 7302

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700E

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7302

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 7302 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13700E

16 / 24

33,824

+1.0%

33,499

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 7302 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 7302: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $588 less on MSRP ($390 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
✅Delivers 153.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.7 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7302

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,500 vs 24,775).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.3 vs 86.7 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700E better than EPYC 7302?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7302 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700E is the stronger fit. You are getting 27.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700E is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700E comes in $588 cheaper on MSRP at $390 MSRP versus $978 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 153.2% better value on MSRP (86.7 vs 34.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 7302 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700E

The Core i7-13700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,824 points. Launch price was $499.

EPYC 7302

The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700E packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the EPYC 7302's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-13700E versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700E (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-13700E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7302 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700E scores 33,824 against the EPYC 7302's 33,499 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-13700E. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,775 vs 19,500 (23.8% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,118 vs 1,192, a 56% lead for the Core i7-13700E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,711 vs 10,254 (35.7% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700E vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302.

Feature	Core i7-13700E	EPYC 7302
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+55%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3 GHz+58%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm	7 nm, 14 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	33,824	33,499
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775+27%	19,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,118+78%	1,192
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,711+43%	10,254

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7302 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700E versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 — the Core i7-13700E supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700E) vs 8 (EPYC 7302). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700E) vs 128 (EPYC 7302) — the EPYC 7302 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610E,Q670E,R680E,W680 (Core i7-13700E) and WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302).

Feature	Core i7-13700E	EPYC 7302
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+75%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700E) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302). The Core i7-13700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7302 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700E targets Embedded Workstation, EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700E rivals Ryzen 7 7700; EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230.

Feature	Core i7-13700E	EPYC 7302
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V, SEV
Target Use	Embedded Workstation	Server / Multi-thread Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700E was priced at $390, while the EPYC 7302 came in at $978. On launch pricing ($390 vs $978), Core i7-13700E was $588 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700E delivers 86.7 pts/$ vs 34.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7302 — making the Core i7-13700E the 86.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700E	EPYC 7302
MSRP	$390-60%	$978
Performance per Dollar	86.7+153%	34.3
Release Date	2023	2019

Search Core i7-13700E on Amazon

Search EPYC 7302 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.