Core i7-13700E vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
Core i7-13700E
Xeon Platinum 8260M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700E
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8260M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-13700E | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($380) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,705) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-13700E | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1919%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($380) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,705) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700E and Xeon Platinum 8260M
Core i7-13700E
The Core i7-13700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,824 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon Platinum 8260M
The Xeon Platinum 8260M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,970 points. Launch price was $7,705.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700E packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-13700E versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260M — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700E (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-13700E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700E scores 33,824 against the Xeon Platinum 8260M's 33,970 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,775 vs 30,500 (20.7% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,118 vs 1,200, a 55.3% lead for the Core i7-13700E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,711 vs 10,491 (33.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700E vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260M.
| Feature | Core i7-13700E | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+31% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 35.75 MB (total)+19% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 33,824 | 33,970 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,775 | 30,500+23% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,118+77% | 1,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,711+40% | 10,491 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700E versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260M — the Core i7-13700E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8260M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700E) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700E) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260M) — the Xeon Platinum 8260M offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610E,Q670E,R680E,W680 (Core i7-13700E) and C621,C622,C624,C627,C628 (Xeon Platinum 8260M).
| Feature | Core i7-13700E | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8260M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i7-13700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700E targets Embedded Workstation, Xeon Platinum 8260M targets Server (Memory Optimized). Direct competitor: Core i7-13700E rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Xeon Platinum 8260M rivals Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | Core i7-13700E | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Embedded Workstation | Server (Memory Optimized) |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700E launched at $390 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8260M debuted at $7705.
| Feature | Core i7-13700E | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $390-95% | $7705 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-13700E and Xeon Platinum 8260M
