Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 4344P

Intel

Core i7-13700E

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 4344P

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······

Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 4344P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 4344P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 4344P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700E

2023

Why buy it

  • +27.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4344P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4344P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 86.7 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

EPYC 4344P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • Costs $61 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
  • Delivers 18.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 86.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
  • 40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,500 vs 24,775).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4344P better than Core i7-13700E?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4344P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700E is the stronger fit. You are getting 27.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4344P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4344P comes in $61 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $390 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-13700E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 27.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 18.5% better value on MSRP (102.8 vs 86.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4344P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 4344P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-13700E

The Core i7-13700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,824 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

EPYC 4344P

The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700E packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 4344P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700E has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-13700E versus 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P — a 3.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 4344P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700E scores 33,824 against the EPYC 4344P's 33,821 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-13700E. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,775 vs 19,500 (23.8% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,118 vs 1,960, a 7.7% lead for the Core i7-13700E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,711 vs 1,896 (154.3% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700E vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P.

FeatureCore i7-13700EEPYC 4344P
Cores / Threads
16 / 24+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.3 GHz+4%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
3.8 GHz+100%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
5 nm-50%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark
33,824
33,821
Cinebench R23 Multi
24,775+27%
19,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,118+8%
1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,711+676%
1,896
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4344P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700E versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P — the Core i7-13700E supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4344P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700E) vs 28 (EPYC 4344P) — the EPYC 4344P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610E,Q670E,R680E,W680 (Core i7-13700E) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P).

FeatureCore i7-13700EEPYC 4344P
Socket
LGA1700
AM5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+8%
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
192 GB+50%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
28+40%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4344P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700E) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700E) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4344P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700E targets Embedded Workstation, EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700E rivals Ryzen 7 7700; EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468.

FeatureCore i7-13700EEPYC 4344P
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use
Embedded Workstation
Entry Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700E was priced at $390, while the EPYC 4344P came in at $329. On launch pricing ($390 vs $329), EPYC 4344P was $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700E delivers 86.7 pts/$ vs 102.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 4344P — making the EPYC 4344P the 17% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-13700EEPYC 4344P
MSRP
$390
$329-16%
Performance per Dollar
86.7
102.8+19%
Release Date
2023
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.