Core i7-13700E
EPYC 4364P
Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 4364P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 4364P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 4364P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700E
2023Why buy it
- ✅+18% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($390 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
EPYC 4364P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 24,775).
- ❌2.3% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$390 MSRP
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700E better than EPYC 4364P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700E vs EPYC 4364P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i7-13700E
The Core i7-13700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,824 points. Launch price was $499.
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700E packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 4364P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700E has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-13700E versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P — a 5.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 1.9 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 4364P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700E scores 33,824 against the EPYC 4364P's 34,215 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 4364P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,775 vs 21,000 (16.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,118 vs 3,085, a 37.2% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,711 vs 15,594 (5.8% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700E vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P.
| Feature | Core i7-13700E | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz+137% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 33,824 | 34,215+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,775+18% | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,118 | 3,085+46% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,711 | 15,594+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4364P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700E versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P — the Core i7-13700E supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700E) vs 28 (EPYC 4364P) — the EPYC 4364P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610E,Q670E,R680E,W680 (Core i7-13700E) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P).
| Feature | Core i7-13700E | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+8% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4364P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700E) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700E) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700E targets Embedded Workstation, EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700E rivals Ryzen 7 7700; EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.
| Feature | Core i7-13700E | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | Embedded Workstation | Entry Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13700E was priced at $390, while the EPYC 4364P came in at $399. On launch pricing ($390 vs $399), Core i7-13700E was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700E delivers 86.7 pts/$ vs 85.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 4364P — making the Core i7-13700E the 1.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700E | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $390-2% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.7+1% | 85.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-13700E and EPYC 4364P
