Core i7-13700E vs Core Ultra 9 285H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700E vs Core Ultra 9 285H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700E vs Core Ultra 9 285H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700E

2023

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 285H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (24,775 vs 26,500).
❌Launch MSRP is still $390 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 285H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core Ultra 9 285H

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 285H better than Core i7-13700E?

Yes. Core Ultra 9 285H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 9 285H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 9 285H is the stronger fit. You are getting 7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 9 285H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-13700E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 9 285H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $390 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-13700E is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (86.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 9 285H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700E vs Core Ultra 9 285H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700E

The Core i7-13700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,824 points. Launch price was $499.

Core Ultra 9 285H

The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700E packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Core Ultra 9 285H's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-13700E versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-13700E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700E scores 33,824 against the Core Ultra 9 285H's 34,327 — a 1.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,775 vs 26,500 (6.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,118 vs 2,720, a 24.9% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,711 vs 15,330 (4.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700E vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H.

Feature	Core i7-13700E	Core Ultra 9 285H
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.9 GHz+53%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+25%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)+50%
Process	10 nm	3 nm-70%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark	33,824	34,327+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775	26,500+7%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,118	2,720+28%
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,711	15,330+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700E versus LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285H — the Core Ultra 9 285H supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700E) vs 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) — the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610E,Q670E,R680E,W680 (Core i7-13700E) and SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H).

Feature	Core i7-13700E	Core Ultra 9 285H
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200	LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400+50%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700E) and Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 285H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700E targets Embedded Workstation, Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700E rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

Feature	Core i7-13700E	Core Ultra 9 285H
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Embedded Workstation	High-end Mobile Workstation